| 213 | 1 | 96 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:探讨常规超声和声触诊组织成像与定量(VTIQ)剪切波弹性成像技术组成的多模态超声联合光谱CT对甲状腺影像报告与数据系统(TI-RADS)4a、4b类结节的诊断价值。方法:选择75例患者,共82个甲状腺TI-RADS 4a、4b类结节,其中4a、4b类结节各41个。病理结果显示良性结节50个,恶性32个。先行常规超声检查,在VTIQ模式下测量病灶及同层面甲状腺腺体横向剪切波速度(SWV)5~7次,获取结节SWV平均值(SWV结节)、病灶同层面甲状腺腺体SWV平均值(SWV腺体)及SWV结节/SWV腺体。行颈部CT增强扫描,获取82个结节的动、静脉期光谱CT各参数结果,即碘浓度(IC)、标准化碘浓度(NIC)、能谱曲线斜率。对多模态超声及光谱CT各项指标行多因素回归分析,得出独立危险因素指标。以手术病理和/或细针抽吸活检结果为金标准,分析联合光谱CT前后多模态超声的诊断效能。结果:声晕、后方衰减、SWV结节/SWV腺体、动脉期IC、动脉期NIC是恶性结节的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。常规超声二分类、多模态超声、多模态超声联合光谱CT的诊断效能分别为:AUC 0.696、0.773、0.891,敏感度59.38%、71.88%、78.13%,特异度78.00%、72.00%、90.00%,阳性预测值63.33%、62.16%、83.33%,阴性预测值75.00%、80.00%、86.54%。结论:多模态超声联合光谱CT后诊断效能大幅提高,对恶性风险较低的TI-RADS 4a类结节,可根据临床需求应用多模态影像学进一步评估结节的良恶性特征,从而减少不必要的细针抽吸活检,为临床决策提供更全面的依据。
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multimodal ultrasound combined with spectral CT analysis,integrating conventional ultrasound and virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) shear wave elastography (SWE),for differentiating thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) 4a and 4b nodules.Methods:This study analyzed 82 thyroid nodules (41 TI-RADS 4a and 41 4b) from 75 patients.Pathological results revealed 50 benign and 32 malignant nodules.All lesions underwent conventional ultrasound followed by VTIQ measurements,where transverse shear wave velocity (SWV) was measured 5—7 times in each nodule and adjacent thyroid parenchyma at the same plane.Three parameters were obtained,mean nodule SWV (SWV1),mean parenchymal SWV (SWV2),and SWV1/SWV2 ratio.Contrast-enhanced spectral CT parameters including iodine concentration (IC),normalized iodine concentration (NIC),and spectral curve slope were acquired during arterial and venous phases.Multivariate regression identified independent risk factors.Using histopathology and/or fine needle aspiration as reference standards,diagnostic performance was compared between multimodal ultrasound alone and combined with spectral CT.Results:Independent risk factors for malignancy included acoustic halo,posterior attenuation,SWV1/SWV2 ratio,arterial-phase IC,and arterial-phase NIC (all P<0.05).The AUCs of conventional ultrasound binary classification,multimodal ultrasound,multimodal ultrasound combined with spectral CT were 0.696,0.773,0.891,the sensitivities of these methods were 59.38%,71.88%,78.13%,the specificities were 78.00%,72.00%,90.00%,the positive predictive values were 63.33%,62.16%,83.33%,the negative predictive values were 75.00%,80.00%,86.54%,respectively.Conclusions:The combination of multimodal ultrasound and spectral CT significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy.For TI-RADS 4a nodules,this integrated approach may reduce unnecessary fine needle aspiration procedures while providing comprehensive imaging evidence for clinical decision-making.
[1]ELBALKA S S,METWALLY I H,SHETIWY M,et al.Prevalence and predictors of thyroid cancer among thyroid nodules:a retrospective cohort study of 1 000 patients[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2021,103(9):683-689.
[2]中华医学会超声医学分会浅表器官和血管学组,中国甲状腺与乳腺超声人工智能联盟.2020甲状腺结节超声恶性危险分层中国指南:C-TIRADS[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2021,30(3):185-200.
[3]吕国荣,陈少华.窗式介入穿刺针的研制及其在难吸性囊性甲状腺结节硬化治疗中的应用[C]//中国超声医学工程学会.中国超声医学工程学会第二届全国介入超声医学学术交流大会论文汇编.2013:3.
[4]GRANI G,SPONZIELLO M,PECCE V,et al.Contemporary thyroid nodule evaluation and management[J].JClin Endocrinol Metab,2020,105(9):2869-2883.
[5]CIBAS E S,ALI S Z.The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology[J].Thyroid,2017,27(11):1341-1346.
[6]TESSLER F N,MIDDLETON W D,GRANT E G,et al.ACR thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS):white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee[J].J Am Coll Radiol,2017,14(5):587-595.
[7]PARK J Y,LEE H J,JANG H W,et al.A proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma[J].Thyroid,2009,19(11):1257-1264.
[8]HUANG S T,ZHANG B,YIN H L,et al.Incremental diagnostic value of shear wave elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in TI-RADS category4a and 4b nodules[J].J Med Ultrason,2020,47(3):453-462.
[9]许杨,刘真.多模态影像学对甲状腺TI-RADS 4a类结节FNA选择时机的分析与展望[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2024,22(5):627-630.
[10]张帆,刘丹丹,刘颜,等.TI-RADS分级联合ARFI对甲状腺结节性质的诊断价值[J].西部医学,2023,35(6):923-926.
[11]YUAN W H,CHIOU H J,CHOU Y H,et al.Grayscale and color Doppler ultrasonographic manifestations of papillary thyroid carcinoma:analysis of 51cases[J].Clin Imaging,2006,30(6):394-401.
[12]邵春晖,王娟,姜珏,等.应变弹性成像与剪切波弹性成像诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值[J].实用临床医药杂志,2023,27(19):113-117.
[13]袁文利,王玉梅,王勇,等.甲状腺癌的超声影像学诊断与病理学对照研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(3):234-237.
[14]郭良云,刘燕娜,陈雪,等.超声对多灶性甲状腺癌的诊断价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2017,25(4):255-258.
[15]甄敏,刘晓娟,杨素筠.VTIQ实时剪切波弹性成像技术、CDFI在甲状腺癌诊疗评估中的应用观察[J].中国实验诊断学,2024,28(2):131-135.
[16]赵立群,张祥林.CT能谱成像在甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(5):614-616,623.
[17]LI M,ZHENG X,LI J,et al.Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of thyroid nodule specimens:comparison with pathologic findings[J].Invest Radiol,2012,47(1):58-64.
[18]李红文,刘斌,吴兴旺,等.能谱CT诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2014,48(2):100-104.
[19]朱新进,李康倩,梁洁玲,等.能谱CT联合形态学特征对甲状腺结节的诊断意义[J].广东医科大学学报,2022,40(5):553-557.
[20]SONG Z,LI Q,ZHANG D,et al.Nomogram based on spectral CT quantitative parameters and typical radiological features for distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid micro-nodules[J].Cancer Imaging,2023,23(1):13.
[21]李菊香,洪晓泉,段少银,等.IQon光谱CT诊断甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移的价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2022,41(10):1853-1858.
[22]张文文.C-TIRADS联合SWE对甲状腺良恶性结节诊断的价值研究[D].合肥:安徽医科大学,2023.
[23]何珂,周兴华,何炼图,等.C-TIRADS分类联合剪切波弹性成像鉴别诊断不同大小甲状腺结节的临床价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2024,26(1):54-58.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R581;R445.1;R816.6
引用信息:
[1]许杨,隋晶姝,秦哲明,等.多模态超声联合光谱CT对甲状腺TI-RADS 4a、4b类结节的诊断价值[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2025,23(02):174-179.
2025-03-21
2025-03-21